Vijay Borra, CEO Of DFW LAND, And Rama Prasad, CTO & Senior VP Of Copart, Guilty Of Fraud
High-stakes Texas real estate litigation involving Vijay Borra and Rama Prasad resulted in major fraud findings, fiduciary breach rulings, and substantial financial liability tied to the PGA Double Eagle investment dispute.
- Irving, Texas
The PGA Double Eagle Litigation
This case centers on allegations of fraud, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, and civil conspiracy tied to the PGA Double Eagle investment project in Texas.
Plaintiffs including SVJ Realty, Varsha Jasti, Smartdocz Investments, Dr. Yashwanth Jasti, and Dr. Chaitanya Korrapati alleged they were misled during the investment process through material misrepresentations and nondisclosures.
Following extensive testimony and evidentiary review, the jury ruled against Vijay Borra and Rama Prasad on multiple claims.
Join the Class Action
- Required Fields
Fraud Findings
Court findings included fraudulent inducement and material misrepresentation claims tied to investor communications and deal structure.
Fiduciary Breach
Plaintiffs argued trust relationships were exploited during the formation and execution of the investment arrangement.
Jury Verdict
The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs after reviewing witness testimony, financial records, and supporting evidence.
Enforcement Risk
With no reported appeal filed before the deadline, plaintiffs may pursue enforcement actions including liens and asset recovery.
Board Member Bios
DFW Board Members
Vijay borra
Rama Prasad
Court Documents
Court Records & Supporting Documentation
- Click to Read
The following materials include publicly referenced court filings, property records, litigation documents, and related evidentiary records associated with the PGA Double Eagle investment dispute involving Vijay Borra and Rama Prasad.
These documents were cited throughout court proceedings and provide insight into the allegations, financial structures, legal arguments, and jury findings connected to the case.
Certified Court Records | Collin County, Texas
01. Master Evidence: Amended Charge & Jury Verdict
The definitive, final legal outcome of the litigation. This official court document details the jury’s final deliberations, answered questions, and the formally amended judicial charge that established liability and concluded the trial proceedings between SJV Realty, LLC et al. and the defendants.
Corporate Mapping & Affiliated Real Estate Holdings
02. Public Entity & Asset Association Report
A comprehensive architectural breakdown mapping out Vijay Borra’s sprawling corporate network. This report links DFW Land entities and key shell LLCs (such as Coppell Lake Breeze LLC and Lucas Park LLC) directly to high-confidence property holdings across North Texas, tracking an estimated hundreds of millions in real estate assets.
Public Asset & Active Investment Land Analytics
03. Commercial Real Estate Market Listing Report
Verified commercial property data detailing major active investment land tracts publicly associated with the development platform. Features granular metrics, including historical traffic volume metrics, public parcel data (e.g., Farm to Market Road 2933), acreage breakdowns, and active market exposure statuses across regional investment hubs.
Dr. Yashwanth Jasti vs. Rama Prasad et al. | Formal Response Record
04. Sworn Physician Declaration & Evidentiary Support
The sworn, executed legal declaration submitted under penalty of perjury by Dr. Yashwanth Jasti. This foundational document directly counters the defendant’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment, introducing formal business record exceptions (Exhibits A-1 through A-9) and establishing the genuine issues of material fact that pushed the case to a full trial.
Why This Case Matters
This litigation highlights the financial and legal consequences that can arise when fiduciary duties, investor transparency, and disclosure obligations are allegedly violated in high-value commercial ventures. The case also demonstrates how missed procedural deadlines can permanently shape the outcome of major litigation.
Fraud Allegations
Claims included fraud, fraudulent inducement, and nondisclosure.
Fiduciary Accountability
The case focused heavily on duties of trust and disclosure.
Investor Protection
The dispute underscores the importance of due diligence in private investment ventures.
Court Enforcement
Final judgments may enable aggressive recovery procedures.
Public Interest
The case drew broader attention due to high-profile business and political associations.
Litigation Timeline
Years of litigation culminated in a substantial jury-backed judgment.
“Our old roof had multiple leaks, and their team handled everything from inspection to repair with total professionalism. They explained every step clearly and finished sooner than expected."
Homeowner, Phoenix AZ
